PRstats™ - The current number of locations of this press release listed in:Diggs on this release
Technorati's on this release
Google 5 Bing 3 Yahoo 6
SOURCE: Brodeur Partners
Survey Identifies New Media's Influence on Energy & Environmental Reporting
Clean Tech Journalists Unconvinced of US Ability to Reduce Fossil Fuel Use
BOSTON, MA--(Marketwire - October 29, 2008) - A recent survey of reporters covering energy, agriculture, and the environment suggests that journalists are skeptical about whether the United States can significantly decrease its dependence on fossil fuel.
Despite McCain and Obama's constant affirmations for an energy independent future, journalists appear to lack faith in our country's ability to follow through with clean energy solutions.
They are divided, however, on what renewable and sustainable fuel source is best suited to reduce this dependence. Reporters are equally split among four different approaches: biofuels, solar, wind, and natural gas.
According to the study, academic institutions and government bodies are the most trusted sources of information on cutting-edge clean energy technologies. Over 90% of journalists view these as credible news sources.
These are some of the highlights of a new survey of journalists covering
energy, agriculture, and the environment by Brodeur Partners, a unit of
Omnicom Group (
The Brodeur study consisted of one online survey taken between September 16 and October 14, 2008. Email invitations were issued to a random sample of reporters in North America covering energy, agriculture, and environment. Approximately 2,500 email invitations were issued per "beat" with a total of 118 completed questionnaires.
"The results track with earlier surveys we have done," said Jerry Johnson, executive vice president of Strategic Planning at Brodeur Partners. "Like their colleagues, reporters covering new energy and the environment spend a considerable amount of time online, both in tracking favorite blogs as well as contributing to their own blog entries."
Brodeur's survey shows that this pool of beat journalists is fairly active in the blogosphere.
-- Approximately three-quarters (71%) of reporters have a list of blogs
that they check on a regular basis.
-- Two out of every three (66.4%) reporters said they spend over an hour
per day reading blogs.
-- Almost nine in ten (89.9%) reporters said they read blogs at least two
to three times a week.
-- One in six (14.3%) reporters have their own blogs and nearly one in
five (18.5%) has their own social networking page.
-- About half (46.2%) of reporters say they are "lurkers" -- reading
blogs but rarely commenting.
Energy, agriculture and environmental reporters had compatible views about which sources of information are most credible.
-- Nearly all (95.8%) journalists said they believe academic institutions
are credible sources of information. Almost two in three (62.2%) said they
are very credible.
-- Nine out of ten (91.6%) reporters trust information from government
bodies.
-- Lobbying organizations and special interest blogs are the least
trusted sources of valid news, as over 70% of journalists said they were
not credible.
There is a significant difference in familiarity with online news sites and blogs. Journalists have their favorites.
-- Of those listed, reporters are much more familiar with Treehugger and
Grist. Nearly one in three (31.9%) reporters says they are familiar with
Grist, while one in four (24.3%) reporters is familiar with Treehugger.
Overall, reporters were divided when asked to choose the best strategy for easing US dependence on fossil fuel within the next 10 years. There is no consensus around one renewable energy source. Of the approaches given, journalists were split among four: biofuels, solar, wind, natural gas.
-- Almost one out of every four (22.9%) journalists sees biofuels as the
most promising energy solution. Solar power is supported by roughly the
same number of reporters (21.2%).
-- One in six (16.1%) reporters says that natural gas is the most
suitable energy strategy, while another 16.1% believes wind power has the
most potential to ease US dependence on fossil fuel.
-- One in five (20.3%) reporters believes the best strategy was not one
of the six listed.
-- Over three quarters of journalists are divided equally among biofuels,
solar, wind, and natural gas.
The real question lies in whether or not these strategies will be implemented correctly to achieve a substantial reduction in fossil fuel use.
-- Two out of three (63%) journalists are not confident that the US will
significantly reduce its dependence on fossil fuels over the next ten
years.
"These survey results are extremely timely, since energy is one of the key political and economic issues of our upcoming election," said Jessica Strange, executive director of media relations, Marketwire. "We've seen a growing number of companies issue news releases about alternative forms of energy, so knowing how journalists think is particularly valuable as our clients prepare their environmental messages."
A full copy of the survey findings is available by emailing Jerry Johnson at jjohnson@brodeur.com. For more information, go to www.brodeurcleantechmediasurvey.com.
About Brodeur Partners
Headquartered in Boston and owned by Omnicom Group, Inc. (

